Treat China's registry as a product requirement, not a paperwork chore
China's Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) doesn't just regulate AIit effectively version-controls access to the market. The result is a public registry that's become a surprisingly practical lens into China's generative AI boom.
The registry is a compliance funnel with real engineering consequences
Teams shipping certain AI tools have to file them with local CAC offices, which then route submissions to the central regulator for approval before the product appears in the public database.
- You're not only proving your model 'works'you're proving it avoids dozens of defined risk classes, from discrimination to psychological harm to content that violates state red lines.
- That pressure tends to push companies toward traceable guardrails, documented data practices, and predictable behaviorthe kinds of controls that are annoying during prototyping but become essential at scale.
Why the database matters outside China
This isn't just a listit's an evolving picture of what's being built.
- For investors and competitors, it's a rare, near-official signal of which categories are heating up (and which firms are actually shipping).
- For multinationals, it's a reminder that 'AI go-to-market' is increasingly jurisdiction-specific architecturepolicy decisions show up as product constraints.
The strategic punchline
If the EU is trying to regulate with a single sweeping framework, China is building something more iterativeand arguably more operational: a system where compliance becomes a launch primitive. For anyone planning partnerships, distribution, or model deployment in China, the registry is effectively part of the platform.