Vivold Consulting
Policy & Regulation

The New York Times is suing Perplexity for copyright infringement

NYT escalates legal battle over AI training data by targeting Perplexity's use of copyrighted material

Key Insights

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Perplexity alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted reporting in training and generation. The case intensifies the legal fight over publisher rights, AI model training, and acceptable use boundaries.

Stay Updated

Get the latest insights delivered to your inbox

Copyright law hits its AI inflection point

The New York Times' lawsuit against Perplexity raises key questions about how AI companies source, store, and transform content. While numerous publishers have negotiated licensing agreements with AI labs, others are choosing to litigatein hopes of shaping the rules of the ecosystem.

What the lawsuit claims

Though details will evolve in court, the allegations reflect broader industry tensions:
  • Perplexity allegedly used Times content without a license for model training and outputs.
  • The Times argues that AI-generated paraphrasing still represents derivative use.
  • The suit seeks to clarify whether AI companies must pay for both training and downstream generation rights.

Why this matters for model builders


Legal exposure is rising:
  • Companies will need strong documentation of training data sources.

  • Licenses may expand to include synthetic variants of copyrighted text.

  • Publishers may push for per-query monetization in addition to flat training fees.

A market moving toward frameworks


This caseand others like itmay catalyze industry-wide standards for ethically sourced and legally defensible datasets. It could also accelerate a shift toward publisher consortiums selling structured, AI-ready archives.

More in Policy & Regulation

All Policy & Regulation stories

Texas slams the brakes on data centres - and the AI buildout's easiest frontier just closed

Governor Greg Abbott announced that all new Texas data-centre projects must be audited by the Public Utility Commission and grid operator ERCOT - a sharp turn for a state whose loose regulation and cheap power made it second only to Virginia for data centres. The trigger is a staggering queue: ERCOT's interconnection requests doubled from 233GW in January to 474GW, about 90% data centres, more than five times the grid's all-time peak demand. Audits will demand power and water use, noise mitigation, light controls, tax-incentive use, and ownership details - after a voluntary survey that most operators simply ignored.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade-secret theft - alleging the scheme ran 'at every level'

Apple sued OpenAI in federal court in Northern California for trade secret theft and breach of contract, alleging former Apple employees took confidential material to benefit OpenAI's consumer hardware ambitions - and that the misconduct was directed by senior leadership, running, in Apple's words, from members of technical staff to the Chief Hardware Officer. Specific claims include an engineer who allegedly kept an Apple laptop and downloaded confidential documents, and OpenAI allegedly using Apple's proprietary metal-finishing technique by misleading a shared supplier into believing it had permission. IO Products is also named. OpenAI says it has no interest in others' trade secrets.

AWS just published the ROI case for GraphRAG: drug research cycles cut by 87%

An AWS GraphRAG deployment in pharmaceutical research cut R&D cycles by 87% - initial discovery that took six months now closes in three weeks - by fusing siloed internal databases and public literature into one queryable knowledge graph on Amazon Neptune Analytics and Bedrock (running Claude). Every answer comes with verifiable citations and a mapped reasoning path, which is exactly what regulated industries need for compliance. The architecture is modular and, crucially, transferable: any enterprise drowning in fragmented legacy data can copy this pattern.