Vivold Consulting

OpenAI files confidentially for an IPO, racing Anthropic to the public markets

Key Insights

OpenAI has confidentially filed a draft S-1 with the SEC for a proposed IPO, about a week after rival Anthropic did the same - intensifying a race to the public markets. OpenAI, last valued around $852B post-money, didn't set a share count or price. The filing comes despite reports it missed user and revenue targets and faces enormous cash burn, with positive cash flow reportedly not expected until 2030.

Stay Updated

Get the latest insights delivered to your inbox

The AI IPO race accelerates

OpenAI confirmed it has confidentially filed a draft S-1 with the SEC for a proposed IPO, roughly a week after Anthropic filed to go public. The move sharpens a genuine race between the two labs, and signals 2026 is shaping up to be a blockbuster year for public markets - with Elon Musk's SpaceX also poised to debut at a $1.75 trillion valuation, and likely to list first among the three.

What the filing says - and pointedly doesn't

Like Anthropic, OpenAI filed confidentially, which lets it begin the process without yet disclosing detailed financials, a share count, or a target price. It was last valued around $852 billion post-money. But the backdrop is more complicated than the headline number suggests.

The financial reality check

The reporting around OpenAI's numbers is sobering:

- It reportedly missed its own user and revenue targets in the sprint toward an IPO, and its CFO is said to have voiced concern about supporting massive data-center spending.
- After raising a record $122 billion in March, the company is expected to spend that much on compute in 2028, burn roughly $85 billion that year even after doubling sales, and not reach positive cash flow until 2030.
- For contrast, Anthropic has painted a rosier picture, saying it is near its first quarterly profit - though with a fresh $65 billion round and reported chip-allocated debt, its burn isn't modest either.

How investors are reading it

Secondary markets offer a window: Anthropic recently surged to a $1 trillion valuation on one retail secondary platform, edging past OpenAI, and one index operator pegged Anthropic's year-to-date appreciation far ahead of OpenAI's. Even so, OpenAI hasn't cratered, and some see investors pricing both as "dual winners" of the LLM race. The catch is timing and scarce capital - experts say whoever lists first likely captures more of the increasingly scarce money flowing to AI, and Anthropic's disclosures will set a valuation comp that constrains how OpenAI can price its own offering. All of this rides atop OpenAI's turbulent history, from the 2023 boardroom ouster and reinstatement of Sam Altman to a thicket of lawsuits and political-donation controversies.

Related Articles

An AWS knowledge-graph deployment turned 6-month research cycles into 3 weeks - and the blueprint transfers far beyond pharma

An AWS GraphRAG deployment in pharmaceutical research cut R&D cycles by 87% - initial discovery that took six months now closes in three weeks - by fusing siloed internal databases and public literature into one queryable knowledge graph on Amazon Neptune Analytics and Bedrock (running Claude). Every answer comes with verifiable citations and a mapped reasoning path, which is exactly what regulated industries need for compliance. The architecture is modular and, crucially, transferable: any enterprise drowning in fragmented legacy data can copy this pattern.

SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI listings will out-value every US VC-backed exit since 2000 - reshaping vendor economics for everyone

The new NVCA-Pitchbook Venture Monitor dropped a stunning claim: the pending OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs, together with SpaceX's listing, will generate more value than every US VC-backed exit since 2000 combined. SpaceX is already public at $1.77 trillion, and with both AI labs pushing toward trillion-dollar debuts, the trio should land north of $4 trillion - against roughly $70 billion in total US IPO proceeds last year. For anyone buying AI services, the labs' shift to public-market scrutiny will reshape pricing, transparency, and vendor stability.

A 14-person open-source team just became the default way 8.9M developers run local AI - and a lever for slashing inference bills

Ollama, the open-source tool that lets developers run open-weight AI models on their own machines in minutes, raised a $65M Series B led by Theory Ventures ($88M total), revealing it now serves 8.9 million developers monthly and sits inside 85% of the Fortune 500 - with just 14 employees. Founders Jeff Morgan and Michael Chiang previously built Docker Desktop, and they're repeating the play: abstract away the hardware pain, then monetise a cloud tier priced on GPU time rather than tokens. The backdrop is the industry's loudest cost debate: every company with heavy inference bills is under existential pressure to shift routine workloads to open models.