Vivold Consulting
Policy & Regulation

EU publishes its AI content labelling playbook ahead of the AI Act's August deadline

The EU's new AI-labelling code previews Article 50 duties that become law on August 2

Key Insights

The EU has published a voluntary Code of Practice for marking and labelling AI-generated content, a practical playbook for meeting transparency duties that become law on August 2, 2026 under Article 50 of the AI Act. From that date, deepfakes and AI-generated text on public-interest matters must be labelled, and users must be told when they're talking to an AI. The code splits the work - model builders mark output in machine-readable form, deployers handle visible labelling - and companies have under two months to prepare.

Stay Updated

Get the latest insights delivered to your inbox

A practical guide before the rules bite

The European Commission has published its AI content labelling Code of Practice, a voluntary playbook to help companies meet transparency rules that become law across the bloc on August 2, 2026. The Commission released the final Code on June 10, setting out concrete steps for businesses that build and use generative AI to mark and label what their systems produce.

Voluntary code, mandatory rules

The Code itself is optional; the obligations it points to are not. They sit under Article 50 of the EU AI Act and apply from August 2 whether or not a company signs the guidance - signing simply gives a business a recognized way to demonstrate compliance. From that date, two things must be clearly flagged: deepfakes and AI-generated or AI-manipulated text published on matters of public interest, and the fact that someone is interacting with an AI system such as a customer-service bot.

How the work is split

The Code divides responsibilities across the AI supply chain. Companies that build generative models are asked to mark their output in a machine-readable format so it can be detected downstream. Companies that deploy those models handle the visible labelling - which, for public-interest AI text, applies when content goes out without human review or editorial control. To keep it workable, the Code leans on open technical standards and a common EU icon, giving users a consistent visual cue rather than forcing each business to invent its own. As the Commission's tech-sovereignty chief framed it, Europeans have a right to know whether what they see, hear, or read was made or altered by AI, particularly when it can shape public debate.

What's still unsettled

This isn't the last word. The Code is open for signatures, still needs the Commission and the AI Board to deem it adequate, and will be accompanied by separate guidelines clarifying what it leaves out. Drawn up by six independent experts with input from more than 180 stakeholders, it's the first instrument to tackle AI content labelling under the Act - and with under two months until the deadline, companies serving European users have little slack to work out what they must label, and how.

More in Policy & Regulation

All Policy & Regulation stories

Texas slams the brakes on data centres - and the AI buildout's easiest frontier just closed

Governor Greg Abbott announced that all new Texas data-centre projects must be audited by the Public Utility Commission and grid operator ERCOT - a sharp turn for a state whose loose regulation and cheap power made it second only to Virginia for data centres. The trigger is a staggering queue: ERCOT's interconnection requests doubled from 233GW in January to 474GW, about 90% data centres, more than five times the grid's all-time peak demand. Audits will demand power and water use, noise mitigation, light controls, tax-incentive use, and ownership details - after a voluntary survey that most operators simply ignored.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade-secret theft - alleging the scheme ran 'at every level'

Apple sued OpenAI in federal court in Northern California for trade secret theft and breach of contract, alleging former Apple employees took confidential material to benefit OpenAI's consumer hardware ambitions - and that the misconduct was directed by senior leadership, running, in Apple's words, from members of technical staff to the Chief Hardware Officer. Specific claims include an engineer who allegedly kept an Apple laptop and downloaded confidential documents, and OpenAI allegedly using Apple's proprietary metal-finishing technique by misleading a shared supplier into believing it had permission. IO Products is also named. OpenAI says it has no interest in others' trade secrets.

AWS just published the ROI case for GraphRAG: drug research cycles cut by 87%

An AWS GraphRAG deployment in pharmaceutical research cut R&D cycles by 87% - initial discovery that took six months now closes in three weeks - by fusing siloed internal databases and public literature into one queryable knowledge graph on Amazon Neptune Analytics and Bedrock (running Claude). Every answer comes with verifiable citations and a mapped reasoning path, which is exactly what regulated industries need for compliance. The architecture is modular and, crucially, transferable: any enterprise drowning in fragmented legacy data can copy this pattern.